Mandating health initatives

"Abbott asked for and received the authority to order divorced parents to purchase health insurance for their children from a vendor of the state’s choosing if coverage was not otherwise available," says Democratic strategist Glenn Smith. Abbott clearly is not politically or ideologically opposed to such programs, further exposing the hypocrisy behind his cynical and dangerous lawsuit." Smith is referring to an Abbott-promoted effort put forward in Senate Bill 66 by state Sen. Here is the author's statement from the Senate Research Center analysis of that bill: The goal of this bill is to ensure that children in the child support system are covered by health insurance.Federal law requires parents in the child support system to provide health coverage for their children."Rather," says Strickland, "to satisfy an existing federal requirement, it provides an alternative insurance program that will pool thousands of children together to lower the cost of their health insurance." The attorney general's office also invokes the 10th Amendment, which says that "powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Strickland says, "The Constitution does not delegate to the United States the power to mandate that all Texans buy insurance. That is why Texas can require drivers to purchase auto insurance, but the federal government cannot." UPDATE: In addition to the questions raised above, here's a letter containing several more sent to Abbott by seven Democratic members of the Legislature: Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap.At a time when newsroom resources and revenue across the country are declining, The Texas Tribune remains committed to sustaining our mission: creating a more engaged and informed Texas with every story we cover, every event we convene and every newsletter we send. Yes, I'll donate today The Texas Tribune is pleased to provide the opportunity for you to share your observations about this story.Attorney General Greg Abbott is engaged in a major lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of new federal health care reform legislation, on the grounds that the United States does not have the authority to mandate that individuals buy health insurance.Now, some political observers are saying that Abbott took the opposite position in the last legislative session.The food landscape in this country is ever changing.And USDA is involved in managing those changes as related to many areas of food processing and food distribution.

In that time, USDA Food Safety Discovery Zone outreach events in the national capital region exposed approximately 619,539 consumers to food safety messages.

From the inspection of domestic product, imports, and exports; conducting risk assessments; and educating the public about the importance of food safety, USDA is there.

USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) ensures that our nation's meat, poultry and processed egg supply is wholesome, safe and properly labeled.

USDA is also a major contributor of consumer food safety content to the website, Food Safety.gov, the gateway to Federal food safety information.

To further engage consumers about the importance of food safety at home, USDA teamed with the Ad Council to develop the campaign, a national, multi-media food safety public education campaign to prevent cross-contamination and to ensure proper cooking and chilling. The campaign motivates consumers to take four simple steps--clean, separate, cook and chill--to protect themselves and their families from foodborne illness.

Leave a Reply